首页> 外文OA文献 >Prevention of multiple pregnancies in couples with unexplained or mild male subfertility: randomised controlled trial of in vitro fertilisation with single embryo transfer or in vitro fertilisation in modified natural cycle compared with intrauterine insemination with controlled ovarian hyperstimulation
【2h】

Prevention of multiple pregnancies in couples with unexplained or mild male subfertility: randomised controlled trial of in vitro fertilisation with single embryo transfer or in vitro fertilisation in modified natural cycle compared with intrauterine insemination with controlled ovarian hyperstimulation

机译:预防原因不明或轻度男性不育的夫妇多胎妊娠:单胚胎移植体外受精或改良自然周期体外受精与子宫内授精与卵巢过度刺激相比较的随机对照试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

To compare the effectiveness of in vitro fertilisation with single embryo transfer or in vitro fertilisation in a modified natural cycle with that of intrauterine insemination with controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in terms of a healthy child. Multicentre, open label, three arm, parallel group, randomised controlled non-inferiority trial. 17 centres in the Netherlands. Couples seeking fertility treatment after at least 12 months of unprotected intercourse, with the female partner aged between 18 and 38 years, an unfavourable prognosis for natural conception, and a diagnosis of unexplained or mild male subfertility. Three cycles of in vitro fertilisation with single embryo transfer (plus subsequent cryocycles), six cycles of in vitro fertilisation in a modified natural cycle, or six cycles of intrauterine insemination with ovarian hyperstimulation within 12 months after randomisation. The primary outcome was birth of a healthy child resulting from a singleton pregnancy conceived within 12 months after randomisation. Secondary outcomes were live birth, clinical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, multiple pregnancy, time to pregnancy, complications of pregnancy, and neonatal morbidity and mortality 602 couples were randomly assigned between January 2009 and February 2012; 201 were allocated to in vitro fertilisation with single embryo transfer, 194 to in vitro fertilisation in a modified natural cycle, and 207 to intrauterine insemination with controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. Birth of a healthy child occurred in 104 (52%) couples in the in vitro fertilisation with single embryo transfer group, 83 (43%) in the in vitro fertilisation in a modified natural cycle group, and 97 (47%) in the intrauterine insemination with controlled ovarian hyperstimulation group. This corresponds to a risk, relative to intrauterine insemination with ovarian hyperstimulation, of 1.10 (95% confidence interval 0.91 to 1.34) for in vitro fertilisation with single embryo transfer and 0.91 (0.73 to 1.14) for in vitro fertilisation in a modified natural cycle. These 95% confidence intervals do not extend below the predefined threshold of 0.69 for inferiority. Multiple pregnancy rates per ongoing pregnancy were 6% (7/121) after in vitro fertilisation with single embryo transfer, 5% (5/102) after in vitro fertilisation in a modified natural cycle, and 7% (8/119) after intrauterine insemination with ovarian hyperstimulation (one sided P=0.52 for in vitro fertilisation with single embryo transfer compared with intrauterine insemination with ovarian hyperstimulation; one sided P=0.33 for in vitro fertilisation in a modified natural cycle compared with intrauterine insemination with controlled ovarian hyperstimulation). In vitro fertilisation with single embryo transfer and in vitro fertilisation in a modified natural cycle were non-inferior to intrauterine insemination with controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in terms of the birth of a healthy child and showed comparable, low multiple pregnancy rates.Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN52843371; Nederlands Trial Register NTR939
机译:为了比较健康儿童的体外受精与单胚移植的体外受精或经改良自然周期的体外受精与宫内受精和控制性卵巢过度刺激的体外受精的有效性。多中心,开放标签,三臂,平行组,随机对照非劣效性试验。荷兰有17个中心。夫妇在至少12个月无保护的性交后寻求生育治疗,其女性伴侣年龄在18至38岁之间,自然受孕预后不良,并且诊断为原因不明或轻度的男性不育。在随机分配后的12个月内,以单胚胎移植的三个体外受精周期(加上随后的冷冻周期),经过修改的自然周期的六个体外受精周期或六个卵巢过度刺激的宫内授精周期。主要结局是在随机分组后的12个月内从单胎妊娠中获得一个健康的孩子。次要结局为活产,临床妊娠,持续妊娠,多胎妊娠,怀孕时间,妊娠并发症以及新生儿发病率和死亡率,在2009年1月至2012年2月之间随机分配了602对夫妇。 201只被分配给具有单个胚胎移植的体外受精,194只被分配给经过修改的自然周期的体外受精,而207只被分配给具有受控卵巢过度刺激的子宫内授精。在单胎移植组的体外受精中,有104对夫妇生育了健康的孩子(52%),在改良自然周期组的体外受精中有83对(43%),宫腔内有97对(47%)卵巢受精控制组受精。相对于子宫内授精与卵巢过度刺激的风险,单胚胎移植体外受精的风险为1.10(95%置信区间0.91至1.34),而在改良的自然周期中进行体外受精的风险为0.91(0.73至1.14)。这些95%的置信区间不会低于自卑的预定义阈值0.69。进行单胚胎移植的体外受精后,每次正在进行的妊娠的多重妊娠率分别为6%(7/121),经过修改的自然周期的体外受精后为5%(5/102),宫内术后为7%(8/119)卵巢过度刺激的人工授精(单次胚胎移植的体外受精的单侧P = 0.52与卵巢过度刺激的宫内人工授精的单侧P = 0.33;与受控的卵巢过度刺激的宫腔内人工授精相比,改良的自然周期的体外受精的单侧P = 0.33)。就健康孩子的出生而言,通过单胚胎移植进行体外受精和以改良的自然周期进行体外受精均不逊色于宫腔内人工授精和可控的卵巢过度刺激,并且显示出可比的低多重妊娠率。 ISRCTN52843371;荷兰土地注册登记簿NTR939

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号